What is the REC continuation page for rework?

• A. When a new REC is created
• B. When an unsatisfactory condition is discovered during the performance of a REC and a different procedure is required
• C. When an unsatisfactory condition is discovered during the performance of a REC and the exact same procedures are required to correct the discrepancy
• D. When maintenance is postponed

Answer: (C)

The core idea is that a continuation page is used to document rework when you must repeat the same procedures due to an unsatisfactory condition found during the original rework. If, while performing the rework, the condition still isn’t corrected and you need to redo the work exactly as written—using the same steps—you add a continuation page to the existing REC to capture that repeated effort. This keeps the record consistent, preserves the exact instructions used, and shows that the issue required another pass with the same method.

If a different procedure were required to address the discrepancy, that would imply a change in how the work is done and would be documented differently rather than as a simple continuation with the same steps. Creating a new REC isn’t the right approach for continuing rework within the same task, and postponing maintenance isn’t related to the rework documentation.